3rd Party Studies in Matific's Effectiveness.

USA Standardised Test

In 2017 we compared schools which use Matific and schools which don’t

We compared a sample of Matific Schools’ results to the national and state averages, and these are the results.

At the federal level, the Matific schools had on average, a 17% higher pass rate than other schools. 
At the state level, the Matific schools had on average, a 7% higher pass rate than other schools in their local state.

Naplan - Australia Standardised Test

We compared the Naplan results of 50 schools before they started using Matific (2015) and after they had used Matific (2017)

Next we compared their results against the national average. The same 50 schools showed a significant improvement against the national average after using Matific in their school.

Naplan - Australia Standardised Test

In 2017 we compared schools which use Matific and schools which don’t

The graph above compares the performance of schools who use Matific, to the national average of Australian schools in the 2017 Naplan Assessments.

A 3rd party study in Matific’s Effectiveness

During the 2016-2017 school year, SEG Measurement conducted a year-long study

In this study, over 1477 students were given the same post-test at the end of the school year. The scores of the test were measured and compared between students who had used Matific (Treatment Group) and the students who hadn’t used Matific during the year (Control Group). Here are the results.

We’re always working with teachers to try to understand the impact Matific has & can have in the classroom

We are in constant contact with teachers, so that we can understand the impact Matific is having in the classroom. This helps us to continually refine and improve Matific. In one of our surveys, we asked a sample group of teachers what some of the effects they are seeing in the classroom when using Matific. The above graph shows the results of what teachers said.